Wednesday, January 17, 2007
 

Now that I've endorsed Barack Obama, my many readers have flooded my inbox and comments with a lot of silly questions. I'm going to respond to some of those questions now, and in doing so, I will settle the issues for all time.

Is Obama really electable?
I could write about how I think it's critical the top of the Democratic ticket never have voted for the war in Iraq. I could talk about how I think that the pop-culture phenom of Obama -- the thing that so many use as an excuse to dismiss him -- is proof of his electability. Or I could talk about how "experience" in Washington, especially over the last eight years, is going to be an albatross around the neck of every candidate with it. But for me, I think his electability really is about how he speaks.

Some on the left have begun to criticize his "hollow platitudes," but I think those speeches are exactly the kind of thing that moves the majority of Americans. Hope is important. The idea that we have more in common than we have differences is important. The idea that we can make things better is important. For better or for worse, the people who will elect the next president aren't that interested in the details. The will of the people is what drives politicians to figure out the details. Churchill's speech on Dunkirk wasn't about details, it was about moving the will of the people. MLK's "I Have a Dream" speech wasn't about details, and neither was JFK's inaugural. The Gettysburg Address wasn't about details, either.

The Democratic Party should know by now that a general election isn't going to be won by someone without charisma. For me, electability is about finding someone who can move the will of the people.

Aren't his race and name going to kill him?
I don't know. Maybe. But if we as a nation won't elect someone because they're black or because their middle name is Hussein, then we deserve another four years of George W. Bush.

Obama is spending too much time triangulating his positions and pandering to the center. The Democrats should nominate Jerry Brown.
Obama doesn't believe in everything I believe in. For example, I seriously doubt that he's going to legalize, regulate, and tax "soft" drugs. But the country isn't a fucking Miata that can turn on a dime. It's a gigantic 18-wheeler filled with anvils towing a 45-foot boat filled with really fat people, and it's going way over the speed limit. Bush has moved us so far to the right that we're hitting the rumble strips on the shoulder. But most people on this truck/boat/metaphor thing aren't comfortable just yanking the wheel left as much as we can. We need to safely move back into the right lane before we can move into the passing lane, and that's going to require someone who can convince all these fat bastards that it's safe to move back into the right lane.

In my opinion, Obama realizes that rather than bogging down fighting over things that simply aren't going to happen anytime soon, we should find things we all agree need to be changed and change them.

Analogcabin @ 8:20 AM
Permalink |

-------------------------


2003 - 2007 © TPKI, LLC
All Rights Reserved

CONTACT



BUY A SOUVENIR

BUY ME A GIFT






ADVERTISING

Hate customers?
Advertise on THE SPOONBENDER.


ARCHIVES

June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
November 2007
January 2008

CURRENT


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com